🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a clear warning by the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."